Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster playing cards in a scene from the film 'Maverick', 1994. (Photo by Warner Brothers/Getty Images)
0
0
Ian Fleming’s 1953 novel Casino Royale settles its central duel at a baccarat table, in a
game where the players make very few decisions. The 2006 film kept the villain, the
debt and the casino, then replaced baccarat with Texas hold’em. Each seat cost $10
million. Bond lost his first stake and returned to the table only after the CIA agent Felix
Leiter covered a $5 million rebuy in exchange for custody of Le Chiffre once the game
ended. Martin Campbell’s production shot the card game as 3 separate sequences,
each with its own camera approach, and the finished film grossed $606 million on its
first release.
Concealed Cards and Concealed Motives
Poker is a game of incomplete information. Every player acts on cards nobody else at
the table can see, and every bet is partly a statement about those cards that may or
may not be true. A spy plot has the same structure. The agent works under a false
name, the opponent has a cover of his own, and the story advances each time one of
them tests what the other knows.
Chess, the other game film uses to signal intelligence, lacks that element. Both players
see every piece for the entire match, so a chess scene can show calculation and has
little way to show deceit. A single poker hand requires calculation and deceit within a
few minutes, and a thriller needs both.
Physical Tells on Camera
Casino Royale builds its longest card sequence around one physical habit. Bond
notices a gesture Le Chiffre makes near his damaged eye when he bluffs, bets heavily
on that reading, and loses his entire stake, because Le Chiffre had been warned and
was faking the gesture. In one scene the audience watches the full cycle of intelligence
work, from observation to inference, then a decision made on the inference, and finally
the discovery that the source was compromised.
Close-up photography suits this material. A tell is small enough that only a camera near
the face can show it, and the editing cuts between players who are all trying to hide the
same thing. The scene produces tension with no chase and no weapon drawn, which
gives an action film a slower stretch that still has something at stake.
Baccarat in Earlier Bond Films
The series used cards long before 2006, though never as the main event. Dr. No
introduced Sean Connery’s Bond in 1962 at a chemin de fer table in a London club,
where the game exists to give him a reason to say his name to Sylvia Trench.
Thunderball sent him to a Nassau casino to play baccarat against Emilio Largo in 1965,
and GoldenEye repeated the setup in Monte Carlo with Xenia Onatopp in 1995.
In each case the card game signals wealth and introduces a rival. None of those scenes
asks the audience to follow the play, since baccarat gives a player almost nothing to
decide beyond the size of the wager.
Audience Familiarity with Hold’em
The switch was also a matter of timing. Hold’em was on American cable television every
week after Chris Moneymaker, an accountant from Tennessee, won the 2003 World
Series of Poker Main Event and $2.5 million. By 2006 the producers could assume that
a large share of the audience had watched poker games on television or played a few
hands at a kitchen table, and that assumption let the script skip the rules and spend its
time on the bets.
The one market where the assumption failed shows how heavily the film relied on it.
Hold’em was less familiar in China, so the Chinese release added dialogue explaining
how the game works.
Bluffing and Cold War Strategy
The link between cards and espionage predates the movies. John von Neumann, the
Hungarian-born mathematician, developed part of what became game theory from
watching players bluff, and his 1928 paper on parlor games treated the bluff as a
rational strategy with a calculable value. He expanded that work with the economist
Oskar Morgenstern in the 1944 book Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.
Von Neumann later consulted for the RAND Corporation, which gathered
mathematicians and engineers after the war to develop a science of warfare, and whose
researchers shaped the Cold War principle that any nuclear attack would be answered
by an equally devastating counterattack. Von Neumann’s own summary, as Jacob
Bronowski later recalled it, was that “real life consists of bluffing.” A film that seats a
secret agent at a card table is borrowing from a genuine line of Cold War thought.
Card Tables in Caper Films
The con film uses the table differently. In The Sting, released in 1973, Paul Newman’s
Henry Gondorff poses as a boorish Chicago bookie aboard the 20th Century Limited
and buys into a private, high-stakes game run by the racketeer Doyle Lonnegan, played
by Robert Shaw, knowing that Lonnegan cheats. Gondorff out-cheats him for $15,000, a
debt Lonnegan cannot settle on the spot because a pickpocket working the con has
already lifted his wallet. A con plot needs a scene in which the mark loses to a method
he believed only he controlled, and a card game provides that in a single hand.
Ocean’s Eleven opens its recruitment in 2001 with Brad Pitt’s Rusty Ryan teaching a
table of young television actors, playing themselves, how to spot a bluff. Topher Grace,
Joshua Jackson, Holly Marie Combs, Barry Watson and Shane West lose steadily while
Rusty explains their mistakes, and much of the scene was improvised on set. Before the
heist gives him anyone to deceive, Rusty has already shown that he can read a table of
strangers.
The Riverboat Final in Maverick
Action comedy borrows the tournament structure outright. Richard Donner’s Maverick,
released in 1994, sends Mel Gibson’s Bret Maverick across the West collecting the last
$3,000 of a $25,000 entry fee for a 5-card draw tournament aboard the paddle steamer
Lauren Belle, with $500,000 going to the winner. The tournament gives the film a
deadline and gives every stranger a reason to want the hero’s money, and most of the
film’s chases and fistfights happen on the way to that table. In the final hand Maverick
draws the ace of spades to complete a royal flush against Angel and Commodore
Duvall. The film then undercuts the win, and the prize is stolen twice before the credits.
Limits of the Screen Version
Real hold’em is slow. A player at a live table folds most of the hands dealt and can go
an hour without a decision that would interest a camera. Films compress an evening
into 3 or 4 hands, and the ones they keep are extreme. Screen tournaments tend to end
on a collision of very strong holdings, such as a full house against a straight flush, and
real tables produce that collision very rarely. Spy films borrow poker’s deception
faithfully and its probabilities loosely, and audiences accept the distortion because
deception was the only part of the game the story needed.
